Legal Opinion
Mazur v. Hirsch Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 12, 1931No. 5789PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the order of the District Judge denying to appellant his discharge in bankruptcy.
The record reflects a condition of disorder and delay in the course of the proceedings for the discharge which has greatly confused the correct decision of the cause.
On a petition for discharge filed in 1924, hearings were during the following year had before the referee as special master. Neither party requesting it, no record was kept of the testimony adduced at the hearings, nor was there any written report or recommendation ever signed and filed by the referee…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- In re RuhlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- In re Cage Cotton Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Bank of India v. Chalasani (In re Chalasani)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re ChalasaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Hage v. Joseph (In Re Joseph)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1990
- Russo v. Nicolosi (In Re Nicolosi)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1988
- Hass v. Hass (In Re Hass)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.