Peer v. . Babcock
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 14, 1919, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHogan, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff against the defendants above named to recover damages for personal injuries resulting to him by reason of an accident that occurred in the city of Rochester, July 30, 1917. Defendants Babcock and May are copartners engaged in the coal business in the city of Rochester under the firm name of H. H. Babcock & Co. As bearing upon the nature of the action and the basis of an alleged right to recover herein it is essential that reference be made to the complaint which contains the following allegations:
“ That the said defendants Babcock and May are engaged in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wyllie v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Butler v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Pangburn v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Murray v. . DwightNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Hanatsek v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith Bros., Inc. v. O'BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Dave Lehr, Inc. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Lassen v. Stamford Transit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Younger Bros., Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.