Clouch v. Moyer
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Doniphan District Court. At the March Term, 1879, of the district court, Moyer, as plaintiff, had judgment against Clouch, as defendant, who brings the case to this court. The nature of the action, and the facts, sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The two principal questions involved in this case are as follows:
1. Does the evidence sustain the report and findings of the referee who tried the case in the court below?
2. Upon the facts as alleged and found, can the present action be maintained?
Both of these questions must be answered in the affirmative. As to the first question, we would cite the following authorities: Walker v. Eagle Works Manuf. Co., 8 Kas. 397; Ruth v. Ford, 9 Kas. 17. This is sufficient for the first question; but probably we should give to the second question a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BancroftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Ruth & King v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Walker v. Eagle Works Manufg. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Belt v. MehenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawson v. Lawrence Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Power v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925