Legal Opinion
Green v. Aerosol Research Company
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 16, 1968No. 64 C 2115PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBSON, District Judge.
The defendant has moved for summary judgment. This court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.
This suit is but one of a number of controversies among these parties. In 1952, one of the plaintiffs, Edward H. Green, and Stanley Goldberg formed the Aerosol Research Company (A.R.C.). 1 This relationship lasted until October, 1953, when apparently the dissension between them caused Green to sell out his stock to Goldberg. On January 21, 1954, Green filed a patent application for his B-14 (or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Fabert Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Duffy Theatres, Inc. v. Griffith Consol. Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Coester v. H.H.B. Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1978
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970