Ro-Mai Industries, Inc. v. Weinberg
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Baird, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Ro-Mai Industries, Inc. (“Ro-Mai”), appeals from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission’s decision to award unemployment benefits to its former employee. This court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} Claimant-appellee Paul Weinberg began working at Ro-Mai on October 24, 2005. Twelve days later, Weinberg telephoned Ro-Mai’s owner, Robert Maier, to notify him that he was quitting. On November 7, 2005, Weinberg filed a claim for unemployment benefits.
{¶ 3} The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Peyton v. Sun T v. & AppliancesOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kilgore v. Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bonanno v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Huth v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hartless v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Carden v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Serv.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Grier v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.