Legal Opinion

Ro-Mai Industries, Inc. v. Weinberg

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 2008No. 23792PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baird, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Ro-Mai Industries, Inc. (“Ro-Mai”), appeals from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission’s decision to award unemployment benefits to its former employee. This court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} Claimant-appellee Paul Weinberg began working at Ro-Mai on October 24, 2005. Twelve days later, Weinberg telephoned Ro-Mai’s owner, Robert Maier, to notify him that he was quitting. On November 7, 2005, Weinberg filed a claim for unemployment benefits.

{¶ 3} The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Peyton v. Sun T v. & AppliancesOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Kilgore v. Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bonanno v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Huth v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Hartless v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Carden v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Serv.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Grier v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API