Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Reliant Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 2006No. A05-2165PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Relator challenges the decision by the unemployment law judge (ULJ) affirming his earlier decision that relator quit her job without good reason caused by the employer and was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. Relator argues that: (a) she did not quit; and (b) if she did, she had good reason to do so based on the physical and verbal abuse by a co-worker, of which her employer was aware. We reverse.

FACTS

Relator was employed by Reliant Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc. (Reliant Engineering) for approximately eight-and-one-half years as an administrative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. McNabb v. Cub FoodsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Larson v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Tru-Stone Corp. v. GutzkowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Werner v. MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Thao v. Command Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Barbara Jackson, Relator v. Direct Home Health Care, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Charles Lambert Bey, Relator v. W.W. Johnson Meat Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API