People v. Raymo

This motion by defendant’s attorney has for its purpose a threefold drive: (a) The suppression of

evidence resulting from an unlawful search and seizure; (b) an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes; and (c) a dismissal of the indictment.

No controversy exists regarding the ban by suppression. Conceding the illegality of the search in an opposing affidavit, the District Attorney takes the bull by the horns and moves therein for a dismissal of the first count of the indictment, being the count in which the subject matter resulting from the illegal search, is alleged. He contends, however, that…