Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Realmuto v. Fay
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 26, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, District Judge.
Petitioner, Frank Realmuto, brings this pro se application for a writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that a 1963 New York first degree robbery conviction was based upon an indictment obtained in violation of his federal constitutional rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments.
The indictment in question, returned by the Grand Jury of Kings County on August 25, 1960, is alleged to have been based upon illegally seized evidence. A pre-trial motion to suppress this evidence was granted. However, it appears from the papers submitted on this application…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. NitzbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- People v. . WillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Glenn Rose v. Fred R. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Clarence Mahurin v. E. v. Nash, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U. S. A. ex rel. Sabella v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- United States ex rel. Mahoney v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966