Legal Opinion

Bandeian v. Wagner

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 29, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TODD, Presiding Judge, Middle Section.

The plaintiff, John J. Bandeian, Jr., M.D. has appealed from the summary dismissal of his suit against the defendant, Martin H. Wagner, M.D. for libel.

Plaintiff’s second amended complaint asserts that an unsigned letter containing untruthful statements about plaintiff and another physician was mailed to a patient by the defendant.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is supported by his affidavit that:

2. I have read Exhibit 1 to the Complaint (letter said to have been postmarked on October 24, 1994 and referred to hereinafter as the or this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stokes v. LeungCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  3. Phillips v. Newport Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Ogle v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Braswell v. CarothersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kim Brown v. Christian Brothers UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  2. Twenty Holdings, LLC v. Land South TN, LLC and Brandon MajorsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
  3. Victor Cole v. Joe CarusoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API