Roehm v. Woodruff
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COMPTON, Justice.
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioner was charged by information with having committed “the crime of embezzlement or fraudulent conversion, contrary to Section 40-45-19, New Mexico Statutes 1953 Annotated, in that he did embezzle or fraudulently convert to his own use property belonging to W. E. Mathers.” Upon his arraignment for the offense charged, he entered a plea of guilty and was thereupon sentenced to serve a term in the State Penitentiary of not less than one year nor more than ten years.
Petitioner asserts that the information is void for failure…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. AbramNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- In re KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. OvertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re AvdalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Hogoboom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Ex Parte BoleyNevada Supreme Court · 1960