Legal Opinion

Roehm v. Woodruff

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1958No. 6369PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. Petitioner was charged by information with having committed “the crime of embezzlement or fraudulent conversion, contrary to Section 40-45-19, New Mexico Statutes 1953 Annotated, in that he did embezzle or fraudulently convert to his own use property belonging to W. E. Mathers.” Upon his arraignment for the offense charged, he entered a plea of guilty and was thereupon sentenced to serve a term in the State Penitentiary of not less than one year nor more than ten years.

Petitioner asserts that the information is void for failure…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. AbramNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  2. In re KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. State v. OvertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. In Re AvdalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Hogoboom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ex Parte BoleyNevada Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API