Legal Opinion

State v. Overton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1951PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This ease is here on appeal by the State from a judgment of the Criminal Court of Knox County sustaining a motion to quash the indictment. The indictment charged the defendant in error in substance with a violation of Code Section 7944a. This section of the Code is in the following language: “Any contractor, subcontractor, or other person who, with intent to defraud, shall use the proceeds of any payment made to him on account of im proving certain real property for any other purpose than to pay for labor performed on, or materials furnished by his order for, this specific improvement, while…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. State of Tenn. v. CornellisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wilson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. State v. TateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Daugherty v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In the Matter of Steel Structures, Inc., Bankrupt-Appellee v. Star Manufacturing Company and Detroit Gasket & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  5. People v. FuziMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API