Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Collection Bureau, Inc.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 12, 1981No. A1-79-131PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

VAN SICKLE, District Judge.

This is an action by consumers, Michael and Peggy Bingham, against two related collection agencies, Collection Bureau, Inc. (CBInc), and Collection Bureau of North Dakota, Ltd. (CBLtd) for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.

Plaintiffs allege that the defendant CBInc violated the act in the following particulars:

a. Failure to give the written notice required by 15 U.S.C. § 1692g.

b. The making of an unconscionable interest claim in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(l).

c. Harassment by annoying telephone calls…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trans World Accounts, Inc., a California Corporation, and Floyd T. Watkins v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. Exposition Press, Inc. And Edward Uhlan v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Rutyna v. Collection Accounts Terminal, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Diane Jeter v. Credit Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Paula Jensen v. Pressler & PresslerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Akalwadi v. Risk Management Alternatives, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
  5. Anthes v. Transworld Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API