Seitz v. Heep
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The action was for personal injuries received in a collision between automobiles on a public highway. There was verdict for defendant. The court granted a motion for new trial, and defendant appeals.
New trial was granted upon the ground that error had intervened in giving certain written charges requested by defendant.
Whether there was reversible error in the giving of these charges, or any of them, is the inquiry presented by briefs on appeal.
The complaint counted on simple negligence, and on wanton act of defendant as the proximate cause of the collision. The pica was in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boyette v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Karpeles v. City Ice Delivery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Williams v. WickerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Grauer v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Coleman v. Hamilton Storage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- McRee v. Woodward Iron CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. CarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Foreman v. Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.