Jesse Johnson v. City of Phoenix, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jesse Johnson, No. CV-25-01300-PHX-SHD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Phoenix, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendants the City of Phoenix and Michael Sullivan’s 16 (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Jesse Johnson’s Complaint, (Doc. 17 9). Johnson responded, (Doc. 12), and Defendants replied, (Doc. 15).1 Because Johnson 18 has failed to state a claim for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the 19 motion will be granted, with leave to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.