Legal Opinion
Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Arrow Communication Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 17, 2002No. Nos. 01-1544, 01-1591PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
Arrow Communication Laboratories and other defendants (collectively, “Arcom”) appeal an interlocutory order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, denying its motion for an order to show why plaintiff, Eagle Comtronics, Inc. (“Eagle”) and its counsel should not be held in civil contempt. Eagle Comtronics v. Arrow Communication Labs., No. 00-CV-1694 (N.D.N.Y. June 8, 2001). Eagle cross appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment that Arcom’s products do not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,662,494 (“the '494 patent”) under the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. First Choice Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Pyramid Real Estate Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- ePlus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Brine, Inc. v. STX, L.L.C.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Arrow Communication Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.