Legal Opinion

Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Arrow Communication Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 1, 2002No. 01-1544PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

305 F.3d 1303

EAGLE COMTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,

v.

ARROW COMMUNICATION LABORATORIES, INC. (doing business as Arcom), Northern Catv Sales, Inc., Andrew F. Tresness, Mary Tresness, and Greg Tresness, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 01-1544.

No. 01-1591.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided September 17, 2002.

As Amended on Partial Grant of Rehearing and Denial of Rehearing En Banc November 1, 2002.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED J. Michael Jakes, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-cross…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michilin Prosperity Co. v. Fellowes Manufacturing Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Spotless Enterprises, Inc. v. a & E Products Group L.P.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  3. Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc. v. Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API