United States v. Keegan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
It is argued on behalf of several appellants that Section 11, 50 U.S.C.A. § 311, of the Selective Training and Service Act, under which the indictments were laid, is unconstitutional because of the provisions of Section 8(i) in which Congress declared as a policy that a vacancy caused in employment by reason of induction of an employee into the service of the United States should not be filled “by any person who is a member of the Communist Party or the German-American Bund.” It is unnecessary to do more than advert to Section 14(b) of the same act which says:…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Everett W. Thompson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. KahanerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- United States v. LevitonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Commonwealth v. GeaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- United States v. StrombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.