Harrell v. Atkinson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Fitzgerald — Judge Wall. October 31, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The plaintiff in error brought an action for damages against Atkinson and Parrott, as receivers of the Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad Company, for.personal injuries which he alleged he had sustained by reason of certain acts of negligence specified in the petition. The defendants demurred generally, alleging that “the petition does not set out or show any right or cause of action in favor of said plaintiff against said defendants;” also the defendants demurred generally in a second paragraph, alleging that “the petition does not contain any facts, <5r- sufficient facts, which, if…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwindleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Martin v. Bartow Iron WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Pennington & Evans v. Douglas, Augusta & Gulf Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Considine v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Atkinson v. Dismuke & BrotherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Fried v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Considine v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Dowdell v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.