Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 5, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Van Winicle, A. M.

The parties were married in December, 1926, the husband being approximately twenty years older than the wife, who had been divorced from her first husband. Counsel for the wife stated that “the courtship was clandestine” so far as the husband’s daughter by his first wife and his friends were concerned. This daughter, Enth C. Gorman, is a defendant. The wife alleges, in her hill, that the husband abandoned her *50on February 22d, 1933; that on March 4th, 1933, a separation agreement was executed by her and him wherein he promised to pay her $25 a week, and to make transfers of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McGill v. Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. Holly v. TravisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Halstead v. HalsteadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  4. Gross v. Pennsylvania Mortgage & Loan Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
  5. Sabbarese v. SabbareseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleary v. LafranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  2. Busch v. BuschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Adams v. AdamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  4. Boyce v. BoyceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API