Legal Opinion

Schwaderer v. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1951No. Docket 83, Calendar 44,926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The defendant in this case is a public corporation organized under the provisions of PA 1939, No 147 (CL 1948, § 119.51 et seq. [Stat Ann § 5.2148(1) et seq.]). Said act authorized the counties of Wayne, Washtenaw, Livingston, Oakland and Macomb, to join in a metropolitan district for the purpose of establishing, owning and developing public parks, with connecting drives and highways. The electors in said counties accepted the provisions of the act in accordance with the procedure outlined therein. The governing authority is a board of 7 commissioners, 1 chosen by the board of supervisors in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Hersey Gravel Co. v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. W. H. Knapp Co. v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Moritz v. HorsmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. Essex Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Hoffa v. FitzsimmonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  3. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. John HAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAYTON-HUDSON, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API