Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brenner v. City of Casper

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1986No. 85-267Published

1Concurrence

THOMAS, Chief Justice,

specially concurring.

I agree with the conclusion reached by the majority. There is no question that Lynnanne Brenner was entitled to have a trial by jury in the municipal court of the City of Casper. I cannot accede to the rationale which is adopted in the majority opinion to justify that conclusion. There is no justification for considering the constitu*562tionality of § 5-6-207, W.S.1977. This court historically has pursued a policy of judicial restraint with respect to addressing the constitutionality of statutes. In one way or another the court has said many times that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nehring v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Schoeller v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lapp v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Shafsky v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API