Brenner v. City of Casper
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
THOMAS, Chief Justice,
specially concurring.
I agree with the conclusion reached by the majority. There is no question that Lynnanne Brenner was entitled to have a trial by jury in the municipal court of the City of Casper. I cannot accede to the rationale which is adopted in the majority opinion to justify that conclusion. There is no justification for considering the constitu*562tionality of § 5-6-207, W.S.1977. This court historically has pursued a policy of judicial restraint with respect to addressing the constitutionality of statutes. In one way or another the court has said many times that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nehring v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Schoeller v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Lapp v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Shafsky v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.