Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Salzarulo

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard J. Fried, J.

Defendants, all officers of Plumber’s Local Union No. 2 (Local 2), who are charged in a 183-count indictment with enterprise corruption (Penal Law § 460.20) and related crimes, move to suppress evidence obtained through court-authorized electronic eavesdropping.

In November 1990, after the investigation into alleged labor racketeering and other illegal conduct involving the plumbing industry had been underway for some time, the District Attorney applied for, and obtained, an order authorizing the installation of pen registers on three public telephones…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MartelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. PestanaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
  3. People v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. MartelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API