Legal Opinion
Warren v. Norguard
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1918No. 14769PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered October 13, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian struck by an automobile, after a trial on the merits to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— The respondent, Warren, while upon one of the streets of the city of Seattle, was injured by being struck by an automobile owned by the appellants Norguard, but which, at the time, was driven by one of their sons with whom another son was riding. This action is to recover for the injuries suffered. It was tried to the court sitting without a jury. The court found, among others, the following facts:
“ (2) That on, to wit, the 3d day of May, 1916, the children of said defendants, Omar Norguard and Martin Norguard, Jr., acting as the agents and servants of said defendants, were driving an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hubert v. HarpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Coffman v. McFaddenWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Lloyd v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Carlson v. WolskiWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Feldtman v. RussakWashington Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.