Legal Opinion

Kilian Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 9, 1950No. 54322; protest 135389-K (Rochester)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawbence, Judge:

An importation of stamped steel housings, so-called, was assessed for duty by the collector of customs at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provision in paragraph 397 of'the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397) which provides for “Articles or wares not specially provided for, * * * if composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, lead, copper, brass, nickel, pewter, zinc, aluminum, or other metal, but not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, whether partly or wholly manufactured.”

Plaintiff contends that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API