Legal Opinion

Manhattan Egg Co. v. Seaboard Terminal & Refrigeration Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided August 13, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

The motion is by the plaintiff to strike out the counterclaim contained in the defendant’s answer upon the ground that it is not one which may be interposed in the action. Plaintiff sues for money had and received. Defendant counterclaims, alleging that 220 cases of eggs which were in the defendant’s possession were stolen from it and sold to the plaintiff; that defendant, before the commencement of the present action, demanded their return from plaintiff or payment therefor, which the plaintiff refused; that by reason thereof plaintiff became indebted to defendant for their value, which it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. GrannisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Sage v. Shepard & Morse Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vanleigh Carpet Corp. v. Gene Schoor's Iron ForgeCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API