Barker v. . the New York Central Railroad Company
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from .a judgment of the Superior- Court of the. city - of New York, entered. on the .verdict of-a jury. . The - action-> wa9 for an. alleged unlawful-ejection of the plaintiff’s intestate, Albert W. Page, from the cars .of . the defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from .a judgment of the Superior- Court of the. city - of New York, entered. on the .verdict of-a jury. . The - action-> wa9 for an. alleged unlawful-ejection of the plaintiff’s intestate, Albert W. Page, from the cars .of . the defendant. After the, appeal to this pourt, the original plaintiff, Page, died, and bis.administrators were substituted .in his place. . At - Syracuse,'.; the defendant’s, road divides into two branches, one called the-“old-road,”- going by the.'way of Auburn to Rochester, and.,,the other, .called, the “new.road,’’ going by, the way of Lyons./ to Rochester. On…
1Opinion of the CourtSutherland, J.
The questions on this appeal are pre sented by exceptions taken by Page to'the admission of certain. evidence, and to the charge of the court, and to the refusal of the court to charge certain matters as requested.
The-first exception was to the allowance of the evidence of Budd, the conductor on the train from Albany to Syracuse, in answer to a question asked him as to the regulations of the defendant in regard to the time-bill, or time-table, and entering the time of the arrival and departure of trains. His evidence in answer to this question was, in substance, that it was a regulation of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. GilbertTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. AshleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.