Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Mandujano

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 19, 1976No. 74-754Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom Mr. Justice Marshall joins, concurring in the judgment.

I concur in the judgment of the Court, for “even when the privilege against self-incrimination permits an individual to refuse to answer questions asked by the Government, if false answers are given the individual may be prosecuted for making false statements.” Mackey v. United States, 401 U. S. 667, 705 (1971) (Brennan, J., concurring in judgment). Although the *585Fifth Amendment guaranteed respondent the right to refuse to answer the potentially incriminating questions put to him before the grand jury, in…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API