Armstrong v. Armstrong
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Justin Armstrong, et al., No. CV-24-00897-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 David C Armstrong, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant Armstrong’s motion to transfer venue to the United 16 States District Court of Nevada. (Doc. 13, “Mot.”). Plaintiffs did not respond. For the 17 reasons that follow, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion and transfer this action to the 18 District of Nevada. 19 I. Legal Standard 20 “For the convenience of the parties and witnesses, in the interest of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ventress v. Japan AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Miracle Blade, LLC v. Ebrands Commerce Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2002