Condura Construction Co. v. Milwaukee Building & Construction Trades Council
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In the time which has passed since the judgment of the trial court first restrained defendants’ conduct, the supreme court of the United States has determined that the congress of the United States completely pre-empted the field of labor relations affecting interstate commerce, thus denying to the states all jurisdiction over such matters and has confided the regulation of such matters to the national labor relations board. Guss v. Utah Labor Board (1957), 353 U. S. 1, 77 Sup. Ct. 598, 1 L. Ed. (2d) 601.
The injunction contained in the judgment obtained by the plaintiff against the defendants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guss v. Utah Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen, Local No. 427 v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vogt, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bear v. Iowa District Court for Tama CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Opelt v. CrispWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Miller v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad D/B/A Canadian Pacific v. Iowa District Court for Louisa CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.