Legal Opinion

Universal Credit Co. v. Clay County Trading Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 1938No. 7 Div. 500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit was for statutory penalty for failure, after due notice, to satisfy the record as to lien on automobile. The suit was a nonjury case, judgment being for the plaintiff.

■ The facts may be stated as follows: Appellee purchased an automobile from the Lineville Motor Company on February 1, 1934, executing a conditional sales contract for the balance of the purchase price of $528, payable in monthly installments. Such conditional sales contract was recorded in the probate office. The debt was duly paid about April 4, 1935, and later on and after the date of completion of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Corley v. VizardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Holmes v. BlochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Horn v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Potts v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Alabama Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Lovelady v. BelcherAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API