Legal Opinion
Potts v. Ellis
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 15, 1939No. 7 Div. 550PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
The judgment entry as amended nunc pro tunc is sufficient to support the appeal. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co., 234 Ala. 313, 174 So. 530.
The evidence is without dispute that the written notice, in these words:
“Centre, Alabama.
“December th 24, 1936
“Mr. E. V. Ellis and Mr. W. A. Ellis and Bros. I am asking you Both to clear the records of Cherokee Co. of all noats you hold against me up to this date 24th of Dec. 1936. Yours respectfully,” was delivered by the plaintiff Potts in person to one of the members of the firm in the office of the partnership store. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Loeb v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Steiner & Bro. v. SnowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Dothan Guano Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Standard Credit, Inc. v. National Cement Co., Programming and Systems, Inc., International Computer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Anderson v. Howard Hall CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Clark v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943