City of Cincinnati v. Scheer & Scheer Development
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Cincinnati, challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant-appellee Jindal Builders and Restoration Corporation. The trial court had overruled a magistrate’s findings that the city’s financing of a development project in the Findlay Market neighborhood was not a public improvement.
{¶ 2} But the city’s control over the contractor was tantamount to a principal-agency relationship. The city’s control of financing, possible share of profits, and implementation of city hiring and employment policies established the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Hanson v. KynastOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.