Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Scheer & Scheer Development

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2006No. C-050336Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Cincinnati, challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant-appellee Jindal Builders and Restoration Corporation. The trial court had overruled a magistrate’s findings that the city’s financing of a development project in the Findlay Market neighborhood was not a public improvement.

{¶ 2} But the city’s control over the contractor was tantamount to a principal-agency relationship. The city’s control of financing, possible share of profits, and implementation of city hiring and employment policies established the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hanson v. KynastOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API