Act II Jewelry, LLC v. Wooten
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtHarry D. Leinenweber, Judge
Before the Court are two Motions: a Partial Motion to Dismiss Additional Parties [ECF No. 199] brought by Defendants Elizabeth Ann Wooten, Adornable-U, LLC, Nicole Mead, Shannon Eckels, and Becka Daun (collectively, the "Defendants") and a Motion for Summary Judgment on the breach of fiduciary duty claim [ECF No. 202] brought by Defendant Elizabeth Ann Wooten ("Wooten"). For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Certain Parties [ECF No. 199] is granted with leave to amend and Wooten's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 202] is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The Court assumes…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Act II Jewelry, LLC v. WootenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Act II Jewelry, LLC v. WootenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Burns v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
- Etransmedia Technology, Inc. v. Allscripts Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- FTUTB Inc v. Wisconsin Surgery Center LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.