Legal Opinion

Act II Jewelry, LLC v. Wooten

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 14, 2018No. Case No. 15 C 6950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarry D. Leinenweber, Judge

Before the Court are two Motions: a Partial Motion to Dismiss Additional Parties [ECF No. 199] brought by Defendants Elizabeth Ann Wooten, Adornable-U, LLC, Nicole Mead, Shannon Eckels, and Becka Daun (collectively, the "Defendants") and a Motion for Summary Judgment on the breach of fiduciary duty claim [ECF No. 202] brought by Defendant Elizabeth Ann Wooten ("Wooten"). For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Certain Parties [ECF No. 199] is granted with leave to amend and Wooten's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 202] is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

The Court assumes…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Act II Jewelry, LLC v. WootenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Act II Jewelry, LLC v. WootenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Burns v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  4. Etransmedia Technology, Inc. v. Allscripts Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. FTUTB Inc v. Wisconsin Surgery Center LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API