Legal Opinion

Storm v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1987No. 16098PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Rick Storm appeals from the district court’s decision and order denying his petition for post-conviction relief as provided for in I.C. § 19-4901 et seq. Storm previously had been found guilty of rape. Storm alleges he did not receive effective assistance of counsel at trial. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts as enumerated by Storm and agreed to by the state are as follows. Storm was convicted of committing a rape on June 2, 1981. The victim notified the authorities shortly after the alleged attack. Storm was arrested while walking home from the victim’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Paradis v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Holmes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pizzuto v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Howard v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Parrott v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. HigginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API