Ubeda v. Zialcita
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. The facts, which involve the right to use a trade-mark in the Philippine Islands, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
The plaintiff and appellant is a manufacturer of gin and sués to restrain the use of a trade-mark like his own and to recover double damages. The trade-mark consists of two concentric circles having the words Ginebra de Tres Campanas and the plaintiff’s name between them, and in the centre a device of three bells (Tres Campanas) connected at the top by a ribbon and some ears of grain) with the words Extra Superior under the mouth of the bells. The plaintiff’s autograph is reproduced across the middle of the circular space and the bells. More detail is. unnecessary; but it may be mentioned…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johanna Farms, Inc. v. Citrus Bowl, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Aluminum Fabricating Company of Pittsburgh and Season-All Sales Corp. v. Season-All Window Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Industrial Rayon Corp. v. Dutchess Underwear Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. OttWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Holland v. C. & A. IMPORT CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.