Legal Opinion

State v. Fields

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1988No. C8-87-1100Published

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

In State v. Fields, 416 N.W.2d 734 (Minn.1987), we remanded this case to the Court of Appeals, holding that the Court of Appeals erred in refusing to decide whether, as defendant contended, the trial court erred in departing durationally from the presumptive sentence for the offense of uttering a forged instrument. On remand, the Court of Appeals upheld the departure on the ground that the offense was a “major economic offense.” State v. Fields, 420 N.W.2d 677, 679-80 (Minn.App.1988). Disagreeing with the conclusion that the offense was a “major economic offense,” we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. RottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API