Legal Opinion

United States v. Cooper

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 5, 1991No. 64,157; CM 8802855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Chief Judge:

During the last months of 1988, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Fort Hood, Texas. He was charged1 with the rape of Mrs. M. on August 3, 1988, and adultery with that same woman on the same date, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920 and 934, respectively. He pleaded not guilty to rape but guilty to the adultery.2 He was found guilty of both rape and adultery, but the findings of guilty to adultery were set aside by the military judge as included…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Duvalier Antonio DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Joseph YasakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Eni FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HinojosaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. HaleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API