Legal Opinion

Newell v. Lamping

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1907No. 6345PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered May 14, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey real property.

1Per curiam

On November 25, 1905, the appellant agreed to sell to the respondent A. B. Newell certain real property, situated in the city of Seattle, receiving from him at the time the sum of $50 as part of the purchase price, and giving him the following agreement:

“Nov. 25, 1905.
“Received of A. B. Newell ($50) fifty dollars as earnest money to be applied on purchase of lot 1, block 1, and lots 1 to 10 inclusive, block 10, Elmore Addition, purchase price to be $150.00 per lot and conditioned on furnishing a good and sufficient title within 30 days from date.
“(Signed) Geo. B. Lamping.”

At the time of the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Allen v. Farmers & Merchants BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kessler v. PruittIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bloom v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API