Gonzalez v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtEgan Jr., J.
*1159We affirm. To the extent that plaintiffs’ various recusal/ disqualification motions are properly before this Court, we find them to be lacking in merit. “Absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, which is not at issue here, a . . . judge is the sole arbiter of recusal and his or her decision, which lies within the personal conscience of the court, will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion” (Kampfer v Rase, 56 AD3d 926, 926 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 716 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Mokay v Mokay, 67 AD3d 1210, 1213 [2009]). We perceive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. AlomarNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Albany County Department of Social Services v. RossiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Biasutto v. BiasuttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Albanese v. West Nassau Mental Health CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Moray v. MokayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. KenyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Rodriguez v. Jacoby & Meyers, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Adams v. BracciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State of New York v. KonikovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Place v. CiccotelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.