Legal Opinion

United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2004No. 01-50633PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

372 F.3d 1048

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

State of California, Intervenor,

v.

Raphyal CRAWFORD, aka Aarmyl Crawford, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50633.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted En Banc December 8, 2003.

Filed June 21, 2004.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Michael J. McCabe, San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant.

Carol C. Lam, U.S. Atty., Sherri Walker Hobson, Asst. U.S. Atty. (on brief), David P. Curnow, Asst. U.S. Atty. (oral argument and petition for rehearing), United States Attorney's Office, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Appea…

Also in this document: Concurrence · O'Scannlain; Concurrence · Kleinfeld; Dissent.

2Cases cited116 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Gasca-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Lajai PridgetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Adrian Reyes v. Greg LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Creditors Comm Adamson Apparel v. Arnold SimonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Jovan'z Smith v. Ken ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API