Legal Opinion

Nave v. Todd

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from DeKalb Circuit Court— Hon. James P. Grubb, Judge. (1) Parol partition of land followed by possession of the respective portions assigned to each is valid. Hazen v. Barnett, 50 Mo. 507. (2) Possession of real estate is evidence of the title of the possessor to all who know of the possession.

Read the full summary

Appeal from DeKalb Circuit Court— Hon. James P. Grubb, Judge. (1) Parol partition of land followed by possession of the respective portions assigned to each is valid. Hazen v. Barnett, 50 Mo. 507. (2) Possession of real estate is evidence of the title of the possessor to all who know of the possession. Shumate v. Reavis, 49 Mo. 336 ; Maupin v. Emmons, 47 Mo. 306; Vaughn v. Tracy, 22 Mo. 417, and 25 Mo. 318. (3) Nave, as mortgagee, is not a purchaser for value; the conveyance was a mortgage to secure an antecedent debt. (4) The finding and judgment should have been for defendant because…

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

1. This was an action of ejectment. ' Todd was the tenant of McDonald. McDonald pleaded an .•equitable defence. Plaintiff recovered judgment for the undivided one-half of 80 acres of land in DeKalb county, from which defendants appealed.

The plaintiff’s title consisted of a mortgage made by PI. Clay Kerr, and a sheriff’s deed dated March 7th, 1865, made upon a sale under the foreclosure of the mortgage. The suit to foreclose the mortgage was instituted by Nave against Kerr in the circuit court of ■.that county. The defendant was notified by publication •returnable to the March term, 1863.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Downing v. StillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Branstetter v. RivesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864
  3. Stacker v. Cooper Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  4. Harbor v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  5. Emery v. WhitwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Neenan v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Jenness v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  4. Pulitzer Publishing Co. v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Reed Bros. v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API