Peterson v. State
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sandefur
¶1 Bryce Everett Peterson appeals the denial of his petition for postconviction relief. The Montana Twenty-First Judicial District Court determined the petition was timely but denied it on the merits. We address two issues on appeal:
1. Was Peterson’s petition for postconviction relief timely?
2. Did Peterson’s showing of newly discovered evidence satisfy § 46-21-102(2), MCA?
¶2 We conclude Peterson’s petition was not timely and agree with the District Court’s determination that Peterson’s claims of newly discovered evidence were unsubstantiated. We therefore affirm the denial of Peterson’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HermanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Danny SartainMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Smith v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. J. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Peterson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2020