Legal Opinion

Kucher v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 2, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

On the court’s own motion, the notices of appeal from the amended order entered May 16, 2006, are deemed applications for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CCA 1702 M).

Amended order, insofar as appealed from by plaintiff, reversed without costs, the provision determining that plaintiffs entitlement to relief as against defendant DaimlerChrysler Corp. is limited solely to his reasonable attorney’s fees stricken, and matter remanded to the court below for the entry of judgment against defendant DaimlerChrysler Corp. following an assessment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SpitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Singer v. Land Rover North America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  3. Diaz v. Audi of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Kucher v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russo v. BMW of North America, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API