Legal Opinion

Diaz v. Audi of America, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of warranty and violation of General Business Law § 198-b, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered July 1, 2003, which denied *358her motion to compel disclosure, and (2) an order of the same court entered December 18, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, in effect, denied her cross motion for leave to renew her prior motion to compel disclosure.

Ordered that the order entered July 1, 2003, is affirmed, without costs or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marro v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Roman v. North Shore Orthopedic Ass'n, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Audi of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Diaz v. Audi of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Kucher v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
  4. Francis v. Atlantic Infiniti, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API