Legal Opinion

Maples v. Rawlins

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

RBOM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. R. H. Sansom, Sp. Oh.

1Opinion of the Court

Wtlkks, -T.

The question in this case is one of homestead. Rawlins recovered judgment against Maples June 30, 189S; Maples bought the real *458estate in controversy December 1-9, 1898. On the same (lay that he bought it and had it conveyed to himself, but at a later ’hour, he mortgaged it bade to Ward, from whom he got it, to secure him the balance of purchase money. Rawlins had the property levied on, and complainant filed this bill against him and the Sheriff to have his right to homestead declared. The Chancellor decreed that complainant was entitled to a homestead exemption, hut that defendant…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shanks v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. In re HurtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
  3. SBAM PARTNERS, LLC v. Cheng Miin WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Carmack v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Cooper v. PotterTennessee Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API