Legal Opinion

Domanick v. Triboro Coach Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1940Published

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The complaint is assailed on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The allegations of the complaint, conceded to be true for the purposes of this motion, set forth a specific and clear violation by the defendants of the plaintiffs’ rights, arising, in brief, as follows: In anticipation of an election ordered by the State Labor Relations Board — and subsequently held, in which the Transport Workers’ Union of America was designated by a vote of 169 against 79 employees of the Triboro Coach Corporation as the exclusive bargaining agency for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Livingston v. Van IngenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
  5. Matter of Wallach's, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API