Domanick v. Triboro Coach Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
The complaint is assailed on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The allegations of the complaint, conceded to be true for the purposes of this motion, set forth a specific and clear violation by the defendants of the plaintiffs’ rights, arising, in brief, as follows: In anticipation of an election ordered by the State Labor Relations Board — and subsequently held, in which the Transport Workers’ Union of America was designated by a vote of 169 against 79 employees of the Triboro Coach Corporation as the exclusive bargaining agency for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Livingston v. Van IngenCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1812
- Matter of Wallach's, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.