Legal Opinion

Kubic v. Audette

Massachusetts Land Court

Decided July 16, 2021No. MISC 13-480929Published

1Opinion of the Court

KUBIC vs. AUDETTE, MISC 13-480929

VINCE KUBIC and PAUL KUBIK, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID AUDETTE, Defendant

MISC 13-480929

JULY 16, 2021

WORCESTER, ss.

ROBERTS, J.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON REMAND

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on remand from the Appeals Court after its decision in Kubic v. Audette, 98 Mass. App. Ct. 289 (2020) ("Kubic"). In that decision, the Appeals Court concluded (1) that the plaintiffs, Vince Kubic and Paul Kubik (together, "Plaintiffs" and individually, "Vince" and "Paul," respectively), not defendant David Audette ("Audette"), [Note 1] own the fee in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Labounty v. VickersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Sheftel v. LebelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Sullivan v. DonohoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API