Sullivan v. Donohoe
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The plaintiff and the defendants Donohoe (whom we will call simply the defendants) own adjoining lots, with a frontage of twenty-three feet each; on the westerly side of Albany Street in Boston, the plaintiff’s lot being the more northerly. The entire front of each lot was occupied by a building about ninety years old. Access to the rear of the lots was had by a common covered passageway along the boundary line between the lots, occupying apart from walls eighteen inches of the width of each lot. Each party had an easement by grant in this passageway, which was to be kept in repair at equal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Everett v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Union National Bank v. NesmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Crabtree v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Harvey v. Inhabitants of SandwichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Commercial Wharf East Condominium Ass'n v. Waterfront Parking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Guillet v. LivernoisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Sheftel v. LebelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.