United States v. Viengxay Chantharath
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
A jury convicted Viengxay Chantharath and Patricio Guzman-Ortiz of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Chantharath and Guzman-Ortiz both challenge their convictions and sentences. Chantharath challenges the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
1. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
1. Chantharath
In 2009, Chantharath distributed methamphetamine in Worthington, Minnesota, and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. In the summer of 2009, Chantharath…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Mark PrieskornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Adetokunbo AdejumoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Patricio Guzman-Ortiz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Lawrence JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Shelton OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013