Legal Opinion

United States v. Viengxay Chantharath

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2013No. 12-1273, 12-1620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

A jury convicted Viengxay Chantharath and Patricio Guzman-Ortiz of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Chantharath and Guzman-Ortiz both challenge their convictions and sentences. Chantharath challenges the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

1. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

1. Chantharath

In 2009, Chantharath distributed methamphetamine in Worthington, Minnesota, and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. In the summer of 2009, Chantharath…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Mark PrieskornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Adetokunbo AdejumoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. Patricio Guzman-Ortiz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Lawrence JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Shelton OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API