Legal Opinion

Thorp Credit, Inc. v. Barr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 19, 1972No. 54919PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This appeal challenges the procedures employed in a replevin action and attacks the constitutionality of our replevin statute. The trial court ruled any procedural defects were waived by a general appearance and found the replevin chapter constitutional. We affirm.

Elmer R. Barr and his wife Ruth, hereafter defendants, entered into a security agreement October 4, 1968 with Thorp Credit Inc., hereafter plaintiff. Plaintiff, a lending institution, had loaned a sum to defendants. The agreement securing this loan covered various items of personal property, some of which would be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. Houlahan v. BrockmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Lonning v. LonningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of DullSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Stoller Fisheries, Inc. v. American Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Adamatic, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Mike Garoogian D/B/A Atlas Truck & Equipment Company v. Gerald Medlock, J. E. Medlock and J. Medlock Produce, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Montano v. Scottsdale Baptist Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API